A Case Study for Winning
Debt Collection Actions in
The following has been taken from a state action brought by Midland against an alleged Debtor. The documents include jurisdiction specific statutes and case law. This will most likely require being changed to reflect the jurisdiction they are filed into if out side of California.
It is not necessarily presented in any particular order:
2. First request for production
3. Motion to Compel
4. Meet and confer
5. Judicial notice
7. Decleration in support Limine
8. MTC Seperate statement
9. Response to Admission
10. Response to Doc request
11. Response to ROGS
12. Seadragon's 60day Pretrial Timeline
13. Trial Notes and Witness Questions
It should be pointed out that Midland is a debt buyer which could make a difference in what is asked and/or demanded. Fundementally, it remains the same for all debt collection actions.
(Special Thanks go out to Kirby)
Interested in knowing
Why pay debt collectors when you can make them pay you?!
Make'm pay when they break the rules!
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way
of making decisions than by putting those decisions
in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong"
- Thomas Sowell
© Copyright 2000-Present